Alicia Dahling, editor
Independent essays for thinking clearly.
Follow the evidence through culture, business, beauty, technology and modern life.
A selected argument
Congress stalled on the Clarity Act, so the SEC is writing crypto's rules itself.
A deregulatory carve-out by agencies, four days after a family-linked bank charter.
See what holds up
What I am looking for
The useful distinction is usually the one the headline leaves out.
Edited in the open
Every argument leaves a paper trail.
The red line does not decorate the page. It follows each story from the confident claim to the inconvenient fact.
The current issue
What holds up. What does not.
Business and Money
Who profits while the Clarity Act sits in the Senate?
8 min read
Essay
Why does anti-tech extremism keep coming back?
9 min readBusiness and Money
What does SEC Regulation Crypto actually do while Congress stalls?
9 min read
Business and Money
Why Are Companies Rehiring the Workers They Fired for AI?
6 min read
Lifestyle
What Is Oura's 95 Percent Sleep Accuracy Number Actually Measuring?
12 min readThe Dahling Index
Editor's note
I am interested in the point where a confident claim meets inconvenient evidence.
Alicia writes from the vantage point of someone who spent years watching big decisions get made, justified, revised and occasionally undone.
Why I edit this wayLatest essay: Why does anti-tech extremism keep coming back? with a sourced reference of cells, targets and assessments.
From the studio
The Daily
Video, from the studio: Dahling Digital Daily.
Ghost Servers: Idle Machines, Unwatched AI
One Click Hijacked an AI Agent
A Watermark Is Not a Verdict
AI Wrote a Virus: The First AI-Designed Life Form (Full Story)
The Summer AI Went Rogue: How Safety Tests Escaped Into the Real WorldDahling Digital Daily on YouTube →The studio: dahlingdigital.com →